Share:

On Friday evening the students and faculty of Thomas Aquinas ¹ū¶³“«Ć½ gathered for the annual Presidents’ Day Lecture, presented by Dr. Vincent Phillip MuƱoz, associate professor of religion and public life and associate professor of law at the University of Notre Dame. The address, part of the St. Vincent DePaul Lecture Series, was titled, ā€œDid the American Founders Intend to Separate the Church from the State?ā€

In his lecture, Dr. MuƱoz laid out the common liberal and conservative understandings of the founders’ approach to the role of religion in public life. ā€œThe key to the founders’ solution, in the liberals’ story, is the privatization of religion and the elimination of religion from the public square,ā€ said Dr. Munoz. ā€œConservatives,ā€ he continued, ā€œagree that the founders meant to separate church from state, but they deny that this means religion must be separate from politics.ā€

munoz-lecture14-250a.jpg
munoz-lecture14-250b.jpg

According to Dr. MuƱoz’s research, however, ā€œthe historical record is more complicated — and more interesting — than either the liberals or the conservative story would let us know.ā€ Dr. MuƱoz spent most of the lecture examining this record, analyzing the writings of Jefferson (whose position most closely resembles that of today’s liberals), Washington (most sympathetic to modern conservatives), and Madison (somewhere in between). ā€œThere is no single church-state position that can claim the exclusive authority of America’s founding history,ā€ he concluded. ā€œNo one founder’s position should be assumed to reflect the original meaning of the Constitution.ā€

Yet despite the lack of consensus among the nation’s founders, Dr. MuƱoz insisted that their opinions still be taken seriously. ā€œBecause they disagreed, they advanced arguments to defend their competing positions, and they made those arguments using philosophical reasoning and prudential calculations that can be as applicable today as they were 200 years ago,ā€ explained Dr. MuƱoz. ā€œI probably don’t need to say this to this audience, but disregarding the founders because they disagreed or because they wrote in a different age unnecessarily overlooks the thoughtfulness of some of America’s greatest political thinkers.ā€

In thanking the audience for the opportunity to speak, Dr. MuƱoz admitted that this, his first visit to campus, was ā€œbittersweetā€ because, in hindsight, he wishes he had come to Thomas Aquinas ¹ū¶³“«Ć½ as an undergraduate. ā€œAppreciate what you have,ā€ he told the students. ā€œIt’s truly amazing.ā€

Then, addressing the ¹ū¶³“«Ć½ā€™s benefactors and administrators, Dr. MuƱoz added, ā€œWhat you’re doing here — we need it, badly. ¹ū¶³“«Ć½s and universities are changing rapidly, and most colleges and universities, I think, need to change and adapt. But this place — with its dedication to the pursuit of truth, the pursuit of beauty, truth illuminated by the faith — this place needs to stay the same. So stay the course and do what you’re doing.ā€